My 15yo son has been set a task by his English teacher.
She is introducing the class to debating.
He has to debate Scottish Independence.
He has to debate against it.
When I stopped laughing, and he assured me he was serious, yeah OK I started laughing again.
Hysteria I reckon….
Not a single politician the length and breadth of this nation has put forward a reasonable argument in support of the Union.
How is my 15yo, who quite frankly couldn’t give a toss, supposed to do this?
Not one to be beaten I turned to Twitter. There’s a lot of Scottish Independence noise on there so I put a call out on the #indyref tag for help.
My first reply was from a union supporter…
OKaaaaay…. I’ll assume my exasperation was construed as a threat of violence… it’s a stretch but hey-ho I fed the troll.
A couple of Independence supports then offered, along with condolences, some advice…. to check out Lesley Riddoch’s website, consider the debate from the British perspective (i.e. to whose advantage is it for Scotland to remain in the UK?) and possibly argue military/defence/scientific research as areas where being part of something bigger could be construed as a plus.
Then along came another unionist….
FFS – it IS a debate, a debate NEEDS two sides. I’m just trying to FIND the other side!
When I pointed this out to unionist no 2 and managed to convince them (I think) that I had a genuine reason for asking they replied…
When I asked for links or sites or anything that could expand on this I got nyada back.
It’s absolutely crazy that I can’t ask this simple question, with good reason, in a forum (a hashtag) set up to debate this very question.
Those against Scottish Independence are seriously lacking in any argument. They keep calling for debate debate debate but they won’t debate!
Maybe it’s just Twitter?
Maybe the London Scottish Conservative Club have managed to find 5 good reasons?
I am paraphrasing….
1. Why fix something that’s not broken? (NOT broken?)
2. The Scotland Act will make Scotland more accountable for its spending (as would Independence – in fact we’d be totally accountable)
3. (This one deserves to be fully quoted) “Scottish independence could mean the UK’s largest trading partner has a different currency entailing greater risk, cost and bureaucracy” (because everyone we trade with has Sterling…… oh wait… no, no they don’t)
4. An Independent Scotland would mean Westminster losing North Sea Oil revenues (yup!)
5. Scotland’s contribution to the military is far greater than its population share (and this is a good reason to stay? Britain would lose its cannon fodder?)
All this sounds like 5 good reasons for Scottish Independence if you ask me. So that would be a No then. The title of the article gave it away I guess…
Five reasons why Britain is better off with Scotland in it
So, if I have any readers left, and any of you are against Scottish Independence, would you be so kind as to tell me why so I can at least try to help my boy with his English assignment?
Cheers peeps.










